Top Backcountry Ski Bindings 2021: Marker Alpinist vs. Salomon Shift

Choosing the right backcountry ski binding is crucial for a safe and enjoyable experience. This review compares two leading contenders: the Marker Alpinist 12 and the Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC. Both bindings offer a blend of uphill efficiency and downhill performance, but cater to different skiing styles and priorities. The Alpinist 12 prioritizes lightweight design and all-around versatility, making it ideal for frequent backcountry users who value a balance of performance and weight savings. The Salomon Shift, on the other hand, emphasizes downhill performance, offering a more familiar feel for alpine skiers transitioning to backcountry adventures.This in-depth comparison examines the strengths and weaknesses of each binding, considering factors such as weight, durability, touring efficiency, downhill capabilities, and ease of use. We delve into real-world performance based on extensive testing, providing a comprehensive analysis to help you determine which binding best suits your individual needs and skiing style. Whether you're a seasoned backcountry veteran or an alpine skier venturing into the backcountry, this review will guide you towards making an informed decision.

Pros And Cons

Marker Alpinist 12
  • Newer than Atomic Salomon
  • Lighter than Atomic Salomon
  • Slightly improved downhill skiing function
  • Good weight to performance ratio
  • All basic features for touring binding
  • Capable of virtually all human-powered skiing needs
  • Ultralight, implying specialized niche (may be a compromise for some)
Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC
  • Identical to Atomic Shift MNC (advantages apply to both)
  • Essentially a resort alpine binding usable uphill with the correct boot
  • Virtually no downhill compromises compared to average resort binding
  • Certified to DIN alpine and tech standards
  • Lighter and more user-friendly uphill than outdated frame bindings
  • Prone to icing
  • Limited pivot range
  • Fewer heel riser options
  • Much heavier than dedicated touring bindings
  • Too heavy, complicated, and unreliable for regular use
  • More moving parts and bulk than other touring or alpine bindings
  • More avenues for failure; can't be treated like resort bindings
  • Rough handling can cause long-term problems

Read more: Top 5 Burton Ski Bindings: A Buyer's Guide

Marker Alpinist 12: The Ultralight All-Rounder

The Marker Alpinist 12 consistently ranks among the top backcountry ski bindings. Its lightweight design doesn't compromise performance; it excels in various backcountry conditions. This binding offers a superb weight-to-performance ratio, incorporating all essential features for a smooth touring experience.

Close-up of the Marker Alpinist 12 binding
Close-up of the Marker Alpinist 12 binding

While marketed as ultralight, the Alpinist's versatility extends beyond a niche application. It handles diverse terrains effectively, making it suitable for both resort and backcountry skiing. However, consider whether its lightweight nature will be sufficient for your aggressive downhill style.

Image showcasing the Alpinist's performance in backcountry
Image showcasing the Alpinist's performance in backcountry

After several seasons of rigorous testing, the Alpinist 12 continues to impress. Its durability and performance solidify its position as a top contender for backcountry enthusiasts. The binding's capabilities perfectly align with the demands of human-powered backcountry skiing.

Alpinist binding in use on various terrains
Alpinist binding in use on various terrains

Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC: Downhill Performance Meets Touring

The Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC offers a unique approach, blending alpine downhill performance with backcountry touring capabilities. Essentially an alpine binding adaptable for uphill travel, it compromises little in downhill performance. The binding is DIN-certified for both alpine and tech standards.

The Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC binding
The Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC binding

Despite its innovative design, the Shift has drawbacks. It’s heavier than dedicated touring bindings, prone to icing, and offers limited pivot range and heel riser options. These limitations impact its overall performance and reliability compared to dedicated backcountry bindings.

Highlighting the Shift's alpine-style design
Highlighting the Shift's alpine-style design

The Shift excels for skiers prioritizing downhill performance and only occasionally venturing into the backcountry. Its strength lies in its familiarity to alpine skiers, offering a seamless transition between resort and backcountry skiing. However, it's not ideal for frequent or long backcountry tours.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Binding

The Marker Alpinist 12 and Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC cater to different needs. The Alpinist excels as a lightweight, versatile all-around backcountry binding. Its performance and durability make it an excellent choice for frequent backcountry users.

Comparison shot of both bindings
Comparison shot of both bindings

The Salomon Shift is better suited for skiers seeking maximum downhill performance with occasional backcountry excursions. Its heavier weight and fewer touring features make it less suitable for regular backcountry use. Careful handling is crucial to prevent issues.

Tips on handling the Shift binding
Tips on handling the Shift binding

Ultimately, the best binding depends on individual preferences and priorities. Consider your primary use (resort vs. backcountry), desired weight, and downhill performance expectations when making your decision. Both bindings offer compelling features but target distinct user profiles.

Concluding remarks and call to action
Concluding remarks and call to action